EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

THE ACCURACY OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FORECASTS IN ROMANIA AND THE ACTUAL ECONOMIC CRISIS

Mihaela BRATU (simionescu) ()
Additional contact information
Mihaela BRATU (simionescu): Faculty of Cybernetics, Statistics and Economic Informatics, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania

Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Mihaela Simionescu (Bratu)

Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, 2012, vol. 11, issue 2, 56-67

Abstract: In this study, the problem of forecasts accuracy is analysed on three different forecasting horizons: during the actual economic crisis, in few years before the crisis and on a large horizon. The accuracy of the forecasts made by European Commission, National Commission for Prognosis (NCP) and Institute for Economic Forecasting (IEF) for unemployment rate in Romania is assessed. The most accurate predictions on the forecasting horizons 2001-2011 and 2009-2011 were provided by IEF and the less accurate by NCP. These results were gotten using U1 Theil’s statistic and a new method that has not been used before in literature in this context. The multi-criteria ranking was applied to make a hierarchy of the institutions regarding the accuracy and five important accuracy measures were taken into account at the same time: mean errors, mean squared error, root mean squared error, U1 and U2 statistics of Theil. In few years before crisis (2006-2008) another hierarchy of institutions were gotten using the accuracy criterion: NCP, IEF and EC. The combined forecasts of institutions’ predictions are the best strategy to improve the forecasts accuracy on overall and before the crisis. During the economic crisis IEF provided the most accurate predictions, the combined forecasts being a good strategy of improving only the forecasts made by NCP and EC using inversely MSE scheme and equally weighted scheme. The assessment and improvement of forecasts accuracy have an important contribution in growing the quality of decisional process.

Keywords: forecasts; predictions; accuracy; multi-criteria ranking; combined forecasts; combining schemes. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E21 E27 C51 C53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://economic.upit.ro/repec/pdf/2012_2_6.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pts:journl:y:2012:i:2:p:56-67

Access Statistics for this article

Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences is currently edited by Logica Banica

More articles in Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences from University of Pitesti Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Logica Banica ().

 
Page updated 2017-06-21
Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2012:i:2:p:56-67