Abstract:
In "Capital-Skill Complementarity and Inequality: A Macroeconomic Analysis", Krusell, Ohanian, Rios-Rull, and Violante (2000) (KORV hereafter) analyzed the capital-skill complementarity hypothesis as an explanation for the behavior of the U.S. skill premium. We re-fit KORV's model with two alternative capital equipment price series: one proposed by Greenwood et al. (GHK, 1997) and the official, revised National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) data. We find that capital-skill complementarity is preserved, but other results were sensitive to the data used. Specifically, the fit of the model was similar to KORV's using the NIPA data, but not the GHK data. Also, both series produce estimates of the elasticity of substitution between unskilled labor and equipment that are substantially larger than KORV's estimates. (Copyright: Elsevier)
Downloads: (external link) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2007.09.001 Access to full texts is restricted to ScienceDirect subscribers and institutional members. See http://www.sciencedirect.com/ for details.
Review of Economic Dynamics is edited by Gianluca Violante
More articles in Review of Economic Dynamics from Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics Address: Review of Economic Dynamics Academic Press Editorial Office 525 "B" Street, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Christian Zimmermann ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .