The Power of Evidence: Improving the Effectiveness of Government by Investing in More Rigorous Evaluation
Rachel Glennerster ()
National Institute Economic Review, 2012, vol. 219, issue 1, pages R4-R14
The current fiscal climate is focusing attention on the need for more efficient government. However, we have remarkably little rigorous information on which are the most cost-effective strategies for achieving common goals like delivering high quality education in deprived neighbourhoods or reducing carbon emissions. This paper argues that randomised impact evaluations can provide an effective way to generate the information needed to make government more effective. Advances in the theory and practice of running randomised evaluations mean that a wider range of questions can be answered than ever before. Elsewhere in the world, fundamental questions are being answered about how humans behave, which in turn are being used to design new policies which themselves are rigorously tested. By learning from these results, and by conducting more randomised evaluations on issues important to UK policy (both at home and abroad) it will be possible to design more effective policies and do more with less.
Keywords: Randomised evaluations, experiments; development; programme evaluation; behavioural economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:niesru:v:219:y:2012:i:1:p:r4-r14
Access Statistics for this article
National Institute Economic Review is currently edited by January
More articles in National Institute Economic Review from National Institute of Economic and Social Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by SAGE Publishing ().