Rational Beliefs or Distorted Beliefs: The Equity Premium Puzzle and Micro Survey Data

Cheolbeom Park ()

Southern Economic Journal, 2006, vol. 72, issue 3, pages 677-689

Abstract: This paper examines whether the expected equity premium constructed from survey forecasts is consistent with the implications of the rational belief approach or the distorted belief approach to explaining the equity premium puzzle. To address this question, a panel data model with a fixed individual effect and a business cycle effect is analyzed. The results appear more favorable to the distorted belief approach. The average expected equity premium is lower than the average realized equity premium during the sample period. The average bias across economists is significant and varies over the business cycle, which is consistent with distorted beliefs that are excessively pessimistic over expansions and excessively optimistic over contractions.

JEL-codes: G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
View citations in EconPapers

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:72:3:y:2006:p:677-689

Access Statistics for this article

Southern Economic Journal is edited by Laura Razzolini

More articles in Southern Economic Journal from Southern Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Laura Razzolini ().