EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Average Tax Rate Cyclicality in OECD Countries: A Test of Three Fiscal Policy Theories

Davide Furceri () and Georgios Karras ()

Southern Economic Journal, 2011, vol. 77, issue 4, pages 958-972

Abstract: This article investigates the cyclical properties of the average effective tax rate in 26 OECD countries over 1965–2003 to test the validity of three theories of fiscal policy: (i) the standard Keynesian theory, which recommends that tax policy should be countercyclical; (ii) the Tax Smoothing hypothesis, which implies that changes in GDP should be uncorrelated with tax rates; and (iii) the positive theory of Battaglini and Coate (2008), which predicts the average tax rate should be negatively correlated with GDP. Our main finding is that the correlations of tax rates with cyclical GDP are generally quite small and statistically indistinguishable from zero. This finding is quite robust and is more consistent with the implications of the Tax Smoothing hypothesis than either the recommendations of the standard Keynesian model or predictions of the political economy theory of Battaglini and Coate.

JEL-codes: E62 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Average tax rate cyclicality in OECD countries: A test of three fiscal policy theories (2010) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:77:4:y:2011:p:958-972

Access Statistics for this article

Southern Economic Journal is edited by Laura Razzolini

More articles in Southern Economic Journal from Southern Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Laura Razzolini ().

 
Page updated 2013-05-22
Handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:77:4:y:2011:p:958-972