Centralized versus decentralized decision-making in a county government setting

Gökhan R. Karahan, Laura Razzolini and William F. Shughart ()

Economics of Governance, 2002, vol. 3, issue 2, pages 101-115

Abstract: During the November 1988 election cycle, the residents of Mississippi's 82 counties were allowed to choose whether or not to switch to an alternative system for governing the construction and repair of county roads. Under the system then used statewide – the so-called beat system – each of a county's five elected supervisors determined spending priorities and allocated funds within the boundaries of his or her own district. Under the alternative system – the so-called unit system – such choices were to be made by the supervisors collectively and then executed by a hired professional road manager. This paper models the decision of voters to retain the beat system (38 counties) or to switch to the unit system (44 counties). Theory and evidence suggest that the choice between centralized versus decentralized governance depends on the perceived costs and benefits of the alternatives to voters and their elected representatives. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Keywords: JEL Classification: H72. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s101010100038 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://link.springer.de/orders.htm

Access Statistics for this article

Economics of Governance is edited by Amihai Glazer and Kai A. Konrad

More articles in Economics of Governance from Springer
Series data maintained by Christopher F Baum ().