EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The economic effects of restrictions on government budget deficits: imperfect private credit markets

Christian Ghiglino () and Karl Shell ()

Economic Theory, 2003, vol. 21, issue 2, pages 399-421

Abstract: The present paper is an extension of Ghiglino and Shell [7] to the case of imperfect consumer credit markets. We show that with constraints on individual credit and only anonymous (i.e., non-personalized) lump-sum taxes, strong (or “global”) irrelevance of government budget deficits is not possible, and weak (or “local”) irrelevance can hold only in very special situations. This is in sharp contrast to the result for perfect credit markets. With credit constraints and anonymous consumption taxes, weak irrelevance holds if the number of tax instruments is sufficiently large and at least one consumer's credit constraint is not binding. This is an extension of the result for perfect credit markets. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Keywords: Keywords and Phrases: Balanced-budget amendment; Consumption taxes; Credit constraints; Government budget deficit irrelevance; Lump-sum taxes; Overlapping generations.; JEL Classification Numbers: D50; D90; E52; E60; H62; H63. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00199-002-0288-5 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joecth:v:21:y:2003:i:2:p:399-421

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://link.springer.de/orders.htm

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Theory is edited by Nichoals Yanneils

More articles in Economic Theory from Springer
Series data maintained by Christopher F Baum ().

 
Page updated 2009-11-26
Handle: RePEc:spr:joecth:v:21:y:2003:i:2:p:399-421