EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Equivalence of strong and coalition-proof Nash equilibria in games without spillovers (*)

Michel Le Breton, Hideo Konishi () and Shlomo Weber ()
Additional contact information
Michel Le Breton: GREQAM, Chateau Lafarge, Route des Milles, F-13290 Les Milles, FRANCE

Economic Theory, 1996, vol. 9, issue 1, pages 97-113

Abstract: This paper examines the conditions which guarantee that the set of coalition-proof Nash equilibria coincides with the set of strong Nash equilibria in the normal form games without spillovers. We find that population monotonicity properties of the payoff functions, when the payoff of a player changes monotonically when the size of the group of players choosing the same strategy increases, are crucial to obtain the equivalence of these two solution concepts. We identify the classes of games, satisfying population monotonicity properties, which yield the equivalence of the set of coalition-proof Nash equilibria and the set of strong Nash equilibria. We also provide sufficient conditions for the equivalence result even when the population monotonicity assumptions are relaxed.

Date: 1996
Note: Received: March 13, 1995; revised version August 15, 1995
View citations in EconPapers

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Equivalence of Strong and Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria in Games without Spillovers (1995)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joecth:v:9:y:1996:i:1:p:97-113

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://link.springer.de/orders.htm

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Theory is edited by Nichoals Yanneils

More articles in Economic Theory from Springer
Series data maintained by Christopher F Baum ().

 
Page updated 2009-11-26
Handle: RePEc:spr:joecth:v:9:y:1996:i:1:p:97-113