Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Kristof Bosmans and
Luc Lauwers ()
International Journal of Game Theory, 2011, vol. 40, issue 4, pages 791-807
Keywords: Claims problem; Bankruptcy; Taxation; Lorenz dominance; Proportional rule; Constrained equal awards rule; Constrained equal losses rule; Talmud rule; Piniles’ rule; Constrained egalitarian rule; Adjusted proportional rule; Random arrival rule; Minimal overlap rule; D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (13) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jogath:v:40:y:2011:i:4:p:791-807
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... eory/journal/182/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Game Theory is currently edited by Shmuel Zamir, Vijay Krishna and Bernhard von Stengel
More articles in International Journal of Game Theory from Game Theory Society
Series data maintained by Sonal Shukla ().