Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims

Kristof Bosmans and Luc Lauwers ()

International Journal of Game Theory, 2011, vol. 40, issue 4, pages 791-807

Keywords: Claims problem; Bankruptcy; Taxation; Lorenz dominance; Proportional rule; Constrained equal awards rule; Constrained equal losses rule; Talmud rule; Piniles’ rule; Constrained egalitarian rule; Adjusted proportional rule; Random arrival rule; Minimal overlap rule; D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00182-010-0269-z (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims (2007)
Working Paper: Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jogath:v:40:y:2011:i:4:p:791-807

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://link.springer.de/orders.htm

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Game Theory is edited by W. Thomson

More articles in International Journal of Game Theory from Springer
Series data maintained by Guenther Eichhorn ().