Minority Shareholders and Auditors: A Brief History of a Litigious French Merger

Stéphane Trébucq

Accounting, Business and Financial History, 2007, vol. 17, issue 2, pages 313-332

Abstract: The case of a French merger can be used to better understand the nature of conflicts of interest and cognitive conflicts between accountants, shareholders, lawyers and judges. This is especially the case when exchange ratios are unfairly established. When caught in a situation of asymmetric information, minority shareholders try to obtain more information about the auditors' report through judicial proceedings. The financial knowledge possessed by the judge then becomes a necessary condition for shareholders to be protected.

Keywords: Auditor; minority shareholder; merger; trial; exchange ratio; fairness opinion (search for similar items in EconPapers)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.informawo ... 40C6AD35DC6213A474B5 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting, Business and Financial History is edited by J R Edwards and Trevor Boyns

More articles in Accounting, Business and Financial History from Taylor and Francis Journals
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().