Transitory or Persistent? The Effects of Classroom Ethics Interventions: A Longitudinal Study

Ralph Welton and Daryl Guffey

Accounting Education, 2009, vol. 18, issue 3, pages 273-289

Abstract: This paper examines whether an ethics intervention administered during a graduate course in accounting is effective and, if effective, whether the observed moral reasoning gains are transitory or persistent. An established test instrument, Accounting Defining Issues Test (ADIT), was used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. The students completed the ADIT at the beginning of the term prior to the intervention and again at the end of the term. They repeated this task three years after the intervention and completion of the course. The results of this study indicate that gains in moral reasoning ability are persistent, and are not diminished when students accept professional responsibilities. These findings suggest that an appropriately designed ethics intervention, whilst fostering persistent gains in moral reasoning ability, also may be used as a professional ethics socialization tool.

Keywords: Accounting ethics; accounting ethics education; ethical judgment; Kohlberg; mental development; mental reasoning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article& ... 40C6AD35DC6213A474B5 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:accted:v:18:y:2009:i:3:p:273-289

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting Education is edited by Richard M. S. Wilson

More articles in Accounting Education from Taylor and Francis Journals
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().