Abstract:
The theoretical literature on a firm's choice of debt maturity argues that a borrowing firm can signal its value in an asymmetric information setting by borrowing short. This well-known fact is based on Flannery (1986). This note questions the use of debt maturity as a signalling device. It argues that the signalling model by Flannery incorrectly ignores incentive compatibility constraints. If incentive compatibility constraints are added, the parameter space for a separating equilibrium shrinks.