Antidumping and Plant Closure

Robert M. Feinberg () and James Hartigan

International Journal of the Economics of Business, 2007, vol. 14, issue 1, pages 99-109

Abstract: As an indicator of 'material injury' in antidumping petitions, companies often claim plant closings have been caused by unfairly-traded imports or threaten plant closings if no relief is provided. This paper analyzes a sample of 91 companies involved in US antidumping proceedings in the 2002 to 2005 period to examine the determinants of plant closing activity with particular emphasis on the role of the antidumping process in the timing of plant closing announcements. We find that larger firms and firms in declining sectors are more likely to close plants, and that the prize of Byrd Amendment funds may help keep plants in operation (especially for smaller firms for whom these funds are likely to be more important). However, there does not appear to be a consistent and significant relationship between antidumping petitions and the timing of plant closings.

Keywords: Plant Closure; Antidumping; Byrd Amendment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article& ... 40C6AD35DC6213A474B5 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ijecbs:v:14:y:2007:i:1:p:99-109

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of the Economics of Business is edited by Eleanor Morgan and H.E. Frech

More articles in International Journal of the Economics of Business from Taylor and Francis Journals
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().