Factor recovery by principal axis factoring and maximum likelihood factor analysis as a function of factor pattern and sample size

J. C.F. de Winter and D. Dodou

Journal of Applied Statistics, 2012, vol. 39, issue 4, pages 695-710

Abstract: Principal axis factoring (PAF) and maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) are two of the most popular estimation methods in exploratory factor analysis. It is known that PAF is better able to recover weak factors and that the maximum likelihood estimator is asymptotically efficient. However, there is almost no evidence regarding which method should be preferred for different types of factor patterns and sample sizes. Simulations were conducted to investigate factor recovery by PAF and MLFA for distortions of ideal simple structure and sample sizes between 25 and 5000. Results showed that PAF is preferred for population solutions with few indicators per factor and for overextraction. MLFA outperformed PAF in cases of unequal loadings within factors and for underextraction. It was further shown that PAF and MLFA do not always converge with increasing sample size. The simulation findings were confirmed by an empirical study as well as by a classic plasmode, Thurstone's box problem. The present results are of practical value for factor analysts.

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2011.610445 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:japsta:v:39:y:2012:i:4:p:695-710

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.asp

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Applied Statistics is edited by Professor Gopal K. Kanji

More articles in Journal of Applied Statistics from Taylor and Francis Journals
Series data maintained by Michael McNulty ().