Exploring different visions of the model-empirics nexus: Solow versus Lipsey

Robert Goldfarb () and Jonathan Ratner ()

Journal of Economic Methodology, 2009, vol. 16, issue 2, pages 159-174

Abstract: Does empirical work in economics both provoke and test theoretical models, or does model development proceed according to a theory-oriented research program, with little interaction with empirics? Robert Solow and Richard Lipsey have articulated different visions of this relationship. This paper: (i) describes these competing Solow versus Lipsey views; (ii) presents examples illustrating each view; and (iii) draws inferences about factors promoting a close relation between empirics and modeling. Three examples are examined in detail: the 'nursing shortage' literature; Lind's analysis of recent rent control models; and a wide-ranging evaluation of 'is there too little theory in development economics?' by leading development economists. Various factors promoting or inhibiting a close connection between modeling and empirics are identified.

Keywords: models; methodology; theory-empirics connection; nursing shortages; rent control; development economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article& ... 40C6AD35DC6213A474B5 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:16:y:2009:i:2:p:159-174

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Methodology is edited by Mark Blaug

More articles in Journal of Economic Methodology from Taylor and Francis Journals
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().