Still dead after all these years: interpreting the failure of general equilibrium theory

Frank Ackerman ()

Journal of Economic Methodology, 2002, vol. 9, issue 2, pages 119-139

Abstract: More than 25 years after the discovery that the equilibrium point of a general equilibrium model is not necessarily either unique or stable, there is still a need for an intuitively comprehensible explanation of the reasons for this discovery. Recent accounts identify two causes of the finding of instability: the inherent difficulties of aggregation, and the individualistic model of consumer behaviour. The mathematical dead end reached by general equilibrium analysis is not due to obscure or esoteric aspects of the model, but rather arises from intentional design features, present in neoclassical theory since its beginnings. Modification of economic theory to overcome these underlying problems will require a new model of consumer choice, nonlinear analyses of social interactions, and recognition of the central role of institutional and social constraints.

Keywords: General Equilibrium Theory; Instability; Sonnenschein-MANTEL-DEBREU Theorem; Mathematical Modelling; Economics And Physics; Mirowski (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?tar ... &id=56LC75AC1TVWPWUW (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:9:y:2002:i:2:p:119-139

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Methodology is edited by Mark Blaug

More articles in Journal of Economic Methodology from Taylor and Francis Journals
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().