Overlapping Public and Private Governance: Can Forest Certification Fill the Gaps in the Global Forest Regime?Lars H. Gulbrandsen Global Environmental Politics, 2004, vol. 4, issue 2, pages 75-99 Abstract: This article investigates whether forest certification (eco-labeling) is likely to rectify certain omissions in the current global forest regime. Following an examination of the achievements and shortcomings of the forest regime to date, I argue that gaps could be filled by including a broad range of stakeholders in certification standards development; promoting strong environmental and social performance standards in forestry; providing effective control mechanisms; securing producer participation; and penetrating markets. Although the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) was considered initially to have the greatest potential to fill these gaps, the emergence and widespread proliferation of industry-dominated schemes have marginalized the FSC in many countries. The study shows that while forest certification would probably promote more sustainable forestry in the temperate and boreal zones than it would in the tropical zone, the ability of this tool to actually do so remains to be seen. Copyright (c) 2004 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Date: 2004 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:4:y:2004:i:2:p:75-99 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Global Environmental Politics is edited by Peter Dauvergne More articles in Global Environmental Politics from MIT Press |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
Swedish Business School at Örebro University.