First Do No Harm? Tort Reform and Birth Outcomes

Janet Currie () and W. Bentley MacLeod
Additional contact information
W. Bentley MacLeod: Columbia University

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2008, vol. 123, issue 2, pages 795-830

Abstract: In the 1980s and 1990s many states adopted tort reforms. It has been argued that these reforms have reduced the practice of defensive medicine arising from excess tort liability. We find that this does not appear to be true for a large and important class of cases-childbirth in the United States. Using data from national vital statistics natality files on millions of individual births from 1989 to 2001, we ask whether specific tort reforms affect the types of procedures that are performed, and the health outcomes of mothers and their infants. We find that reform of the Joint and Several Liability rule (or the "deep pockets rule") reduces complications of labor and procedure use, whereas caps on noneconomic damages increase them. We show that these results are consistent with a model of tort reform that explicitly allows for variations in patient condition. (c) 2008 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology..

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.795 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: First Do No Harm?: Tort Reform and Birth Outcomes (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://mitpress.mit. ... me.tcl?issn=00335533

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is edited by Robert J. Barro, Edward L. Glaeser and Lawrence F. Katz

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from MIT Press
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().