What's Advertising Content Worth? Evidence from a Consumer Credit Marketing Field Experiment

Marianne Bertrand, Dean S. Karlan (), Sendhil Mullainathan (), Eldar Shafir and Jonathan Zinman ()
Additional contact information
Eldar Shafir: Princeton University and Innovations for Poverty Action.

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2010, vol. 125, issue 1, pages 263-305

Abstract: Firms spend billions of dollars developing advertising content, yet there is little field evidence on how much or how it affects demand. We analyze a direct mail field experiment in South Africa implemented by a consumer lender that randomized advertising content, loan price, and loan offer deadlines simultaneously. We find that advertising content significantly affects demand. Although it was difficult to predict ex ante which specific advertising features would matter most in this context, the features that do matter have large effects. Showing fewer example loans, not suggesting a particular use for the loan, or including a photo of an attractive woman increases loan demand by about as much as a 25% reduction in the interest rate. The evidence also suggests that advertising content persuades by appealing "peripherally" to intuition rather than reason. Although the advertising content effects point to an important role for persuasion and related psychology, our deadline results do not support the psychological prediction that shorter deadlines may help overcome time-management problems; instead, demand strongly increases with longer deadlines. (c) 2010 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology..

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.263 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: What's Advertising Content Worth? Evidence from a Consumer Credit Marketing Field Experiment (2009)
Working Paper: What's Advertising Content Worth? Evidence from a Consumer Credit Marketing Field Experiment (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:qjecon:v:125:y:2010:i:1:p:263-305

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://mitpress.mit. ... me.tcl?issn=00335533

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is edited by Robert J. Barro, Edward L. Glaeser and Lawrence F. Katz

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from MIT Press
Series data maintained by Karie Kirkpatrick ().