Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (To Each Other)?

Jason Abrevaya and Daniel Hamermesh ()

The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2012, vol. 94, issue 1, pages 202-207

Abstract: Using a very large sample of matched author-referee pairs, we examine how referees' and authors' genders affect the referees' recommendations. Relying on changing author-referee matches, we find no evidence of gender differences among referees in charitableness, nor is there any effect of the interaction between the referees' and authors' genders. With substantial laboratory research showing gender differences in fairness, the results suggest that outside the laboratory, an ethos of objectivity can overcome possible tendencies toward same-group favoritism or opposite-group discrimination. © 2011 The President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/REST_a_00163 link to full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (To Each Other)? (2010)
Working Paper: Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (to Each Other)? (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:94:y:2012:i:1:p:202-207

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://mitpress.mit. ... me.tcl?issn=00346535

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economics and Statistics is edited by Daron Acemoglu, George J. Borjas, Dani Rodrik and Julio J. Rotemberg

More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Series data maintained by Karie Kirkpatrick ().