The Role of Bolstering and Counterarguing Mind-Sets in Persuasion

Alison Jing Xu and Robert S. Wyer

Journal of Consumer Research, 2012, vol. 38, issue 5, pages 920 - 932

Abstract: The effect of a persuasive communication on individuals’ attitudes can be influenced by the cognitive behavior they have performed in an earlier, unrelated situation. Inducing participants to make supportive elaborations about a series of propositions activated a bolstering mind-set that increased the effectiveness of an unrelated advertisement they encountered subsequently. However, inducing participants to refute the implications of a series of propositions activated a counterarguing mind-set that decreased the ad’s effectiveness. These mind-sets had more impact when the cognitive behavior they activated differed from the behavior that would occur in the absence of these mind-sets. When the implications of a persuasive message were difficult to refute, inducing a counterarguing mind-set increased its effectiveness. Finally, watching a political speech or debate activated different mind-sets, depending on participants’ a priori attitude toward the politicians involved, and these mind-sets influenced the impact of an unrelated commercial they considered later.

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/10.1086/661112 (application/pdf)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/full/10.1086/661112 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jconrs:doi:10.1086/661112

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Consumer Research from University of Chicago Press
Series data maintained by Journals Division ().