Marriage, Specialization, and the Gender Division of Labor

Matthew John Baker () and Joyce Jacobsen ()

Journal of Labor Economics, 2007, vol. 25, pages 763-793

Abstract: We consider why the gender division of labor is so often enforced by custom and why customary gender divisions of labor generally involve both direction and prohibition. In our formal model, agents first learn skills and then enter the marriage market. We show that wasteful behavior may emerge due to strategic incentives in specialization choice and human capital acquisition and that both problems may be mitigated through a customary gender division of labor. This division is not Pareto improving. Both the distributional effects and welfare gains of a customary gender division of labor decrease as opportunities for market exchange increase.

Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (6) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/resolve?id=doi:10.1086/522907 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: Marriage, Specialization, and the Gender Division of Labor (2005)
Working Paper: Marriage, Specialization, and the Gender Division of Labor (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlabec:v:25:y:2007:p:763-793

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Labor Economics from University of Chicago Press
Series data maintained by Journals Division ().