When Is It Foolish to Reward for A While Benefiting from B?

Wendelin Schnedler

Journal of Labor Economics, 2008, vol. 26, issue 4, pages 595-619

Abstract: A performance measure may or may not reflect the relative importance of different tasks for the production of benefit: it can be aligned or unaligned. Here, I examine when using an aligned measure generates a larger surplus in a principal-agent relationship than using an unaligned but otherwise identical measure. I find that (i) the agent's effort costs matter for the optimal way of measuring performance, and (ii) the optimal measure is not aligned but tilted toward tasks that the agent finds easy. Failing to recognize these insights may lead to false predictions about the use of incentives. (c) 2008 by The University of Chicago.

Date: 2008
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/591150 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlabec:v:26:y:2008:i:4:p:595-619

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JOLE/order1.html

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Labor Economics is edited by Derek A. Neal

More articles in Journal of Labor Economics from University of Chicago Press
Address: The University of Chicago Press, Journals Division, P.O. Box 37005 Chicago, IL 60637
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().