On the Profitability of Media Mergers

Esther Gal-Or () and Anthony Dukes ()

Journal of Business, 2006, vol. 79, issue 2, pages 489-526

Abstract: We examine incentives for nonconsolidating horizontal mergers in commercial media industries. In a model with differentiated media and products, we show that such a merger is profitable if merging media firms gain a relative bargaining advantage vis-à-vis advertisers in the negotiations for advertising space. Whether a bargaining advantage yields profitable conditions for a merger depends on the extent of competition for audiences among media firms. Higher levels of competition make media mergers more profitable. This result contrasts those implied by oligopoly models for traditional product markets, which suggest that mergers become less profitable for higher levels of competition.

Date: 2006
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/resolve?JB790202 main text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jnlbus:v:79:y:2006:i:2:p:489-526

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JB/home.html

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business is edited by Albert Madansky

More articles in Journal of Business from University of Chicago Press
Address: The University of Chicago Press, Journals Division, P.O. Box 37005 Chicago, IL 60637
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().