The Costs and Benefits of Moral Suasion: Evidence from the Rescue of Long-Term Capital Management

Craig Furfine
Additional contact information
Craig Furfine: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Journal of Business, 2006, vol. 79, issue 2, pages 593-622

Abstract: This study examines the level of unsecured borrowing done by the firms that ultimately rescued Long-Term Capital Management in the days leading up to the hedge fund's rescue. Although these banks borrowed less at the height of the crisis, evidence suggests that this reduction in borrowing was demand-driven and did not result from rationing by the market. Further, it is shown that large banks that were not involved with the LTCM rescue saw the rates they pay for unsecured funds decline following the hedge fund's resolution. This finding is consistent with an increase in the strength of a too-big-to-fail policy.

Date: 2006
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/resolve?JB790205 main text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jnlbus:v:79:y:2006:i:2:p:593-622

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JB/home.html

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business is edited by Albert Madansky

More articles in Journal of Business from University of Chicago Press
Address: The University of Chicago Press, Journals Division, P.O. Box 37005 Chicago, IL 60637
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().