Impact on the Environment of Thailand’s Trade with OECD Countries

Kakali Mukhopadhyay
Additional contact information
Kakali Mukhopadhyay: UNEP-NISD, Centre for Development and Environment Policy, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Joka, D.H. Road, Calcutta-7000104, India.

Asia Pacific Trade and Investment Review, 2006, vol. 2, issue 1, pages 1-22

Abstract: The impact of trade liberalization on the environment is a matter of debate. Two conflicting hypotheses have emerged from the debate. One, the pollution haven hypothesis, suggests that the developed countries impose tougher environmental policies than do the developing countries, which results in distortion of existing patterns of comparative advantage. Thus, the polluting industries shift operations from the developed to the developing countries; developing countries therefore become “pollution havens.” The second hypothesis, the factor endowment hypothesis, predicts that trade liberalization will result in trade patterns consistent with the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek theory of comparative advantage based on factor endowment differentials. Rich countries are well endowed with capital. Since capital-intensive goods are often also pollution-intensive, factor-endowment theories of international trade predict that rich countries specialize in polluting goods. Thus, the manifestation of the pollution haven hypothesis is in direct conflict with the factor

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.unescap.o ... aptir2414_kakali.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Asia Pacific Trade and Investment Review from Trade Policy Section, Trade and Investment Division, UNESCAP
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Mia Mikic ().