Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries

Patricia M. Danzon, Andrew Epstein and Sean Nicholson
Additional contact information
Patricia M. Danzon: University of Pennsylvania, USA, Postal: University of Pennsylvania, USA
Andrew Epstein: Yale University, USA, Postal: Yale University, USA

Managerial and Decision Economics, 2007, vol. 28, issue 4-5, pages 307-328

Abstract: We examine the determinants and effects of M&A activity in the pharmaceutical|biotechnology industry using SDC data on 383 firms from 1988 to 2001. For large firms, mergers are a response to expected excess capacity due to patent expirations and gaps in a firm's product pipeline. For small firms, mergers are primarily an exit strategy in response to financial trouble (low Tobin's q, few marketed products, low cash-sales ratios). In estimating effects of mergers, we use a propensity score to control for selection based on observed characteristics. Controlling for merger propensity, large firms that merged experienced a similar change in enterprise value, sales, employees, and R&D, and had slower growth in operating profit, compared with similar firms that did not merge. Thus mergers may be a response to trouble, but they are not a solution. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/mde.1343 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Mergers and Acquisitions in the Pharmaceutical and Biotech Industries (2004)
Journal Article: Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this article

Managerial and Decision Economics is edited by Paul H. Rubin

More articles in Managerial and Decision Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().