A COMPARISON OF SOME UNIVARIATE MODELS FOR VALUE-AT-RISK AND EXPECTED SHORTFALL
Carlo Marinelli (),
Stefano d'Addona and
Svetlozar T. Rachev ()
Additional contact information Carlo Marinelli: Institut für Angewandte Mathematik, Universität Bonn, Wegelerstr. 6, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
Svetlozar T. Rachev: School of Economics and Business Engineering, University of Karlsruhe, Kollegium am Schloss, Bau II, 20.12, R210 D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany; Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
Abstract:
We compare in a backtesting study the performance of univariate models for Value-at-Risk (VaR) and expected shortfall based on stable laws and on extreme value theory (EVT). Analyzing these different approaches, we test whether the sumâstability assumption or the maxâstability assumption, that respectively imply αâstable laws and Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distributions, is more suitable for risk management based on VaR and expected shortfall. Our numerical results indicate that αâstable models tend to outperform pure EVT-based methods (especially those obtained by the so-called block maxima method) in the estimation of Value-at-Risk, while a peaks-over-threshold method turns out to be preferable for the estimation of expected shortfall. We also find empirical evidence that some simple semiparametric EVT-based methods perform well in the estimation of VaR.