Natural funnel asymmetries. A simulation analysis of the three basic tools of meta analysis

Martin Paldam and Laurent A. F. Callot ()

Economics Working Papers from School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus

Abstract: Meta-analysis studies a set of estimates of one parameter with three basic tools: The funnel diagram is the distribution of the estimates as a function of their precision; the funnel asymmetry test, FAT; and the meta average, where PET is an estimate. The FAT-PET MRA is a meta regression analysis, on the data of the funnel, which jointly estimates the FAT and the PET. Ideal funnels are lean and symmetric. Empirical funnels are wide, and most have asymmetries biasing the plain average. Many asymmetries are due to censoring made during the research-publication process. The PET is tooled to correct the average for censoring. We show that estimation faults and misspecification may cause natural asymme¬tries, which the PET does not correct. If the MRA includes controls for omitted variables, the PET does correct for omitted variables bias. Thus, it is important to know the reason for an asymmetry.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; funnel asymmetry; meta average (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B4 C9 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
Date: 2010-01-14
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
ftp://ftp.econ.au.dk/afn/wp/10/wp10_01.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aah:aarhec:2010-01

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Working Papers from School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus
Series data maintained by ().