Why the Marginal Social Cost of Funds is not the Shadow Value of Government Revenue

Chris Jones ()

ANUCBE School of Economics Working Papers from Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics

Abstract: No distinction is made between the marginal social cost of public funds (MCF) and the shadow value of government revenue in the public finance literature. Their separate roles are demonstrated in this paper, where the MCF is used as a scaling coefficient to account for changes in tax inefficiency on revenue transfers made to balance the government budget, while the shadow value of government revenue is used as a scaling coefficient to convert efficiency effects into actual changes in utility. We find a revenue effect identified by Atkinson and Stern (1974) and Dahlby (1998) in the shadow value of government revenue which is not present in the MCF. It is the reason why, in the presence of distorting taxes, the shadow value of government revenue can differ from unity, whereas the MCF is always unity, for a lump-sum tax.

JEL-codes: D61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-05
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ecocomm.a ... papers/pdf/wp449.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ANUCBE School of Economics Working Papers from Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ().