Abstract:
This paper develops a model of competitive price discrimination with horizontal and vertical differentiation. The main application is to add-on pricing – advertising low prices for one good in hopes of selling additional products at high prices. Price discrimination is self-reinforcing: the model sometimes has both equilibria in which all firms practice price discrimination and equilibria in which none do. The paper focuses on the Chicago-school argument that profits earned on add-ons will be competed away via lower prices for advertised goods. The most important observation is that the adoption of add-on pricing practices can create an adverse selection problem that makes price-cutting unappealing, thereby raising equilibrium profits. Although profitable when jointly adopted, using add-on pricing is not individually rational in the simplest model with endogenous advertising strategies. Several models that could account for the prevalence of add-on pricing are discussed.