Is a UN Soil Convention feasible? A comparative analysis
Els Wynen and
David Vanzetti ()
No 125613, 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra from Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society
Recent calls for a UN Convention on Soils begs the question about its feasibility and advisability. International conventions are most likely to be successful where the need for action is compelling, the effects of inaction immediate, dramatic and relatively certain, and there are significant international spillovers. Potential signatories to a convention must believe they would benefit in some way, and that these benefits cannot be obtained if they abstained. We examine the characteristics of six UN conventions related to environmental issues and argue that an international soil convention would not satisfy these and other criteria, and would therefore be difficult to implement.
Keywords: agriculture; soil; UN Conventions; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: /RePEc:ags:aare02:125613
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra from Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by AgEcon Search ().