Exploring the meaning of disproportionate costs for the practical implementation of the Water Framework Directive

Manuel Lago, Dominic Moran and Michael J MacLeod

No 46005, Working Papers from Scottish Agricultural College, Land Economy Research Group

Abstract: The Water Framework Directive (WFD) is perhaps the most ambitious piece of environmental legislation in the history of the European Union. The Directive consolidates existing water-related legislation and has the stated objective of delivering good status (GS) for Europe’s surface waters and groundwaters. But meeting GS is cost dependent, and in some water bodies pollution abatements costs may be high or judged as disproportionate. The exact definition and assessment of disproportionate costs is central for the justification of time-frame derogations and/or lowering the environmental objectives (standards) for compliance at a water body. Official guidance is somewhat discretionary about the interpretation of disproportionate costs. Building on basic cost-benefit theory, this paper attempts to clarify the meaning of disproportionate cost to non-economists, and to convey a consistent interpretation that should underlie the development of a practical derogation decision making across all member states

Keywords: Derogations; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA); Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA); Marginal Abatement Costs (MAC); Marginal Social Costs (MSC) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-12
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://purl.umn.edu/46005 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:saclwp:46005

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Scottish Agricultural College, Land Economy Research Group
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by AgEcon Search ().