Testing for Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Using a Latent Choice Multinomial Logit Model

Steven B Caudill (), Peter A. Groothuis and John C. Whitehead ()

No 06-09, Working Papers from Department of Economics, Appalachian State University

Abstract: The most persistently troubling empirical result in the contingent valuation method literature is the tendency for hypothetical willingness to pay to overestimate real willingness to pay. We suggest a new approach to test and correct for hypothetical bias using a latent choice multinomial logit (LCMNL) model. To develop this model, we extend Dempster, Laird, and Rubin’s (1977) work on the EM algorithm to the estimation of a multinomial logit model with missing information on categorical membership. Using data on both the quality of water in the Catawba River in North Carolina and the preservation of Saginaw wetlands in Michigan, we find two types of “yes” responders in both data sets. We suggest that one set of yes responses are yea-sayers who suffer from hypothetical bias and answer yes to the hypothetical question but would not pay the bid amount if it were real. The second group does not suffer from hypothetical bias and would pay the bid amount if it were real.

Keywords: C25; P230; Q51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm and nep-ecm
Date: 2006
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://econ.appstate.edu/RePEc/pdf/wp0609.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Department of Economics, Appalachian State University
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by John Whitehead ().