Intended and Accidental Bequests in a Life-cycle Economy

Lutz Hendricks ()

Working Papers from Department of Economics, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University

Abstract: This paper studies quantitative importance of accidental versus intended bequests. Bequests are decomposed into accidental and intended components by comparing the implications of a standard life-cycle model under alternative assumptions about bequest motives. The main finding is that accidental bequests account for at least half, and perhaps for all of observed bequests. The paper then examines how assumptions about bequest motives affect the effects of income tax changes. In contrast to previous research, I find that bequest motives are not important for the analysis of capital income taxation. The effects of labor income taxes are reduced by altruistic bequests, but the role played by bequests is much weaker than suggested by previous models.

JEL-codes: D64 D91 E21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://wpcarey.asu.edu/tools/mytools/pubs_admin/FILES/ab_paper.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Department of Economics, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Steve Salik ().