The Balassa-Samuelson Hypothesis Forty Years Later

Berthold Herrendorf () and Akos Valentinyi
Additional contact information
Berthold Herrendorf: W. P. Carey School of Business Department of Economics, http://wpcarey.asu.edu/Directory/stafffaculty.cfm?cobid=2148031
Akos Valentinyi: University of Southampton, http://wpcarey.asu.edu/Directory/stafffaculty.cfm?cobid=2167723

Working Papers from Department of Economics, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University

Abstract: It is well known that there are big cross-country differences in aggregate TFP. Are these differences uniform across sectors or are they driven by even larger TFP differences in specific sectors? Some forty years ago, Balassa and Samuelson hypothesized that the biggest TFP differences are in the tradable sectors. Providing empirical support for this hypothesis is hard because of the lack of data on sector inputs and outputs, at least outside the OECD. We get around this problem by employing economic theory to infer the missing information from the expenditure and price data of the 1996 Benchmark Study of the Penn World Tables. We distinguish between tradable and nontradable consumption and investment. We find that Balassa and Samuelson were right: the cross-country TFP differences are much larger in the tradable sectors than in the nontradables ones.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev

Downloads: (external link)
http://wpcarey.asu.edu/tools/mytools/pubs_admin/FI ... sFortyYearsLater.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Department of Economics, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Steve Salik ().