Abstract:
In the 1950s and 60s Meek and Dickinson argued that, in a Marxian model, the rate of profit would first rise and then fall as capital accumulated. In their recent "A History of Marxian Economics", Howard and King accord this argument the same status as the Okishio theorem. This paper reassesses the argument. It shows that Dickinson's argument violates a basic tenet of the neo-marxian model but that Meek's example may be consistent with an extended version of the same model.
Keywords:MARXISM; PROFIT (search for similar items in EconPapers) JEL-codes:B24E11 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Date: 1997
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.