Comparison of Mean-Variance Theory and Expected-Utility Theory through a Laboratory Experiment

Andrea Morone ()

No 19, series from Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Metodi Matematici - Università di Bari

Abstract: In the 40.s and early 50. two decision theories were proposed and have since dominated the scene of the fascinating field of decision-making. In 1944 . when von Neumann and Morgenstern showed that if preferences are consistent with a set of axioms then it is possible to represent these preferences by the expectation of some utility function . Expected Utility theory provides a natural way to establish .measurable utility.. In the early 50.s Markowitz introduced the Mean-Variance theory that is the basis of modern portfolio selection theory. Even if both models were analyzed from virtually all possible points of view; although they were tested against several generalizations; even though they seem to be the most attractive theories of decision making, they were never tested against each other. This paper will try to fill this gap. It investigates, using experimental data, which of these two models represent a better approximation of subjects. preferences.

Keywords: Expected utility; Mean variance; preference functional; pair wise choice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-upt
Date: 2007-10, Revised 2007-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.dse.uniba.it/Quaderni/SERIES/WP_0019.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Comparison of Mean-Variance Theory and Expected-Utility Theory through a Laboratory Experiment (2008)
Working Paper: Comparison of Mean-Variance Theory and Expected-Utility Theory through a Laboratory Experiment (2005)
Working Paper: Comparison of Mean-Variance theory and Expected-Utility theory through a Laboratory Experiment (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bai:series:wp0019

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in series from Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Metodi Matematici - Università di Bari
Address: Via Camillo Rosalba, 53 - 70124 - Bari ITALY
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Ruggiero Marco Paolillo ().