Policy Complementarities: The Case for Fundamental Labor Market Reform

David Theodore Coe () and Dennis Snower ()

Archive Discussion Papers from Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics

Abstract: The message of this paper can be summarized in two simple points: (i) A wide range of labor market institutions - including unemployment benefits, job security legislation and payroll taxes - have complementary effects on unemployment, (ii) Thus a correspondingly wide range of labor market policies, aimed at reformed these institutions are also complementary. The existence of this network of policy complementarities implies that partial labor market reform - such as implementing job counselling and retraining schemes, while generous unemploument benefits and stringent job security provisions remain in place - is unlikely to achieve significant reductions in unemployment rates. By the same token, active labor market policies are unlikely to be effective in the presence of substantial passive policies. What is required, instead, is a thoroughgoing, many-handed approach, where by a broad range of institutional rigidities are dismantled simultaneously.

Date: 1996
View citations in EconPapers

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Policy Complementarities: The Case for Fundamental Labor Market Reform (1996)
Working Paper: Policy Complementarities: The Case for Fundamental Labour Market Reform (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bbk:bbkewp:9625

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Archive Discussion Papers from Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics
Address: Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, UK
Series data maintained by ().