Abstract:
Due to the use of distortionary taxation, real-world economies should attain a lower level of public expenditures than one might suspect from the analysis of artificial models where lump-sum taxes are assumed to be available. The paper examines this popular hypothesis by means of the two-type self-selection model of income taxation. I provide sufficient conditions for both a lower and a higher level of public expenditures in second best than in first best. Contrary to conventional intuition, these results do not in the first place depend on whether the (second-best) income tax is distortive, but on whether public expenditures reduce the incentive of high-ability agents to imitate less productive individuals.
Keywords:income taxation; public goods (search for similar items in EconPapers) JEL-codes:H41H21 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Date: 1999-04
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
More papers in Discussion Paper Serie A from University of Bonn, Germany Address: Bonn Graduate School of Economics, University of Bonn, Adenauerallee 24 - 26, 53113 Bonn, Germany Series data maintained by Daniel Park ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .