Abstract:
I report here on a series of laboratory tests aimed at a long standing puzzle concerning the impact of arbitration on bargaining behavior. The findings outline a fresh solution. The arbitration puzzle is closely linked to the debate over why disputes arise in bargaining, and so the work speaks to this larger issue as well. The findings are consistent with Scheeling's view that bargaining is essentially a struggle to establish commitment. The link to arbitration illustrates the potential gains to a deeper understanding of this struggle, although the experiments suggest that deeper understanding requires nem models that grapple with what bargainers learn from negotiation.
Date: Written
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
More papers in Discussion Paper Serie B from University of Bonn, Germany Address: Bonn Graduate School of Economics, University of Bonn, Adenauerallee 24 - 26, 53113 Bonn, Germany Series data maintained by Daniel Park ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .