Heterogeneous Responses to Water Conservation Programs: The Case of Residential Users in Los Angeles

W. Hanemann and Celine Nauges ()
Additional contact information
W. Hanemann: University of California, Berkeley

No 1026, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series from Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley

Abstract: We propose a detailed analysis of heterogeneity in households' responses to water conservation programs (price increase, voluntary and mandatory conservation) during periods of water shortage. Using a unique dataset covering water consumption of all residential users in Los Angeles (California) during the drought (1988-1992), we show that households generally were responsive to the conservation measures but that the magnitude of households' responses varies depending on the instrument and on households' characteristics, in particular the size of their lot. Price elasticity is estimated between -0.29 and -0.47 in the high season (June-October), and between 0 and -0.19 in the low season (November-May). Results suggest that the voluntary conservation program [resp. mandatory conservation program] induced a reduction in water use which varies from 1 to 13% [resp. 21% to 29%] depending on the season and the size of the lot. The achieved reduction in consumption is however very similar across households. These data also allow us to compare the effectiveness of price and nonprice policies in terms of water savings. Finally, welfare calculations suggest that households with the smallest lot sizes (and lowest income) suffered the greatest loss during the implementation of the water conservation programs.

Keywords: water conservation; residential use; heterogeneity in behavior; panel data. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-08-25
Note: oai:cdlib1:are_ucb-1127
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1127&context=are_ucb (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:agrebk:1026

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series from Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().