Improving the SGP: Taxes and Delegation rather than Fines

Assar Lindbeck and Dirk Niepelt ()

No CESifo Working Paper No. 1389, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Group Munich

Abstract: We analyze motivations for, and possible alternatives to, the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). With regard to the former, we identify domestic policy failures and various cross-country spillover effects; with regard to the latter, we contrast an “economic-theory" perspective on optimal corrective measures with the “legalistic" perspective adopted in the SGP. We discuss the advantages of replacing the Pact's rigid rules backed by fines with corrective taxes (as far as spillover effects are concerned) and procedural rules and limited delegation of fiscal powers (as far as domestic policy failures are concerned). This would not only enhance the efficiency of the Pact, but also render it easier to enforce.

Keywords: Stability and Growth Pact; spillover effects; policy failures; Pigouvian taxes; policy delegation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E63 F33 F42 H60 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eec, nep-mac and nep-pbe
Date: 2005
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cesifo-group.de/DocCIDL/cesifo1_wp1389.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Improving the SGP: Taxes and Delegation Rather than Fines (2004)
Working Paper: Improving the SGP: Taxes and Delegation rather than Fines (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_1389

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Group Munich
Address: Poschingerstrasse 5, 81679 Munich
Series data maintained by Julio Saavedra ().