Is Soft Paternalism Ethically Legitimate? - The Relevance of Psychological Processes for the Assessment of Nudge-Based Policies
Mira Fischer and
Additional contact information
Sebastian Lotz: Stanford University
No 05-02, Cologne Graduate School Working Paper Series from Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences
In this article we develop a taxonomy of behavioral policy measures proposed by Thaler and Sunstein (2008). Based on this taxonomy, we discuss the ethical legitimacy of these measures. First, we explain two common reservations against nudges (choice architecture) rooted in utilitarian and Kantian ethics. In addition to wellbeing, we identify freedom of action and freedom of will (autonomy) as relevant ethical criteria. Then, using practical examples, we develop a taxonomy that classifies nudges according to the psychological mechanisms they use and separately discuss the legitimacy of several types of behavioral policy measures. We hope to thereby make a valuable contribution to the debate on the ethical legitimacy of behavioral policy making.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe and nep-hap
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cgs.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/wiso_fak/cgs ... aper/cgswp_05-02.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cgr:cgsser:05-02
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Cologne Graduate School Working Paper Series from Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by David Kusterer ().