Reducing Ambiguity in Lotteries: That Knowing is Better than Wondering
Julian Conrads (),
Tommaso Reggiani and
Rainer Rilke ()
No 06-03, Cologne Graduate School Working Paper Series from Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences
Ambiguity about the chances of winning represents a key aspect in lotteries. By means of a controlled field experiment, we exogenously vary the degree of ambiguity about the winning chances of lotteries organized to incentivize the contribution for a public good. In one people have been simply informed about the maximum number of potential participants (i.e., the number of lottery tickets released). In a second treatment this information has been omitted as in all traditional lotteries. Our general finding shows that simply reducing the degree of ambiguity of the lottery leads to a sizable and significant increase (67%) in the participation rate. This result is robust to alternative prize configurations.
Keywords: ambiguity; lottery; field experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D03 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cgs.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/wiso_fak/cgs ... aper/cgswp_06-03.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cgr:cgsser:06-03
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Cologne Graduate School Working Paper Series from Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by David Kusterer ().