Rehabilitated or Not?: To Release(?) is the Question

Dan Bernhardt (), Steeve Mongrain and Joanne Roberts ()

No 2009-06, Working Papers from Department of Economics, University of Calgary

Abstract: When parole boards learn whether inmates are rehabilitated by observing their behavior in prison, we show why they would release one inmate, while continuing to incarcerate another with a longer sentence, but who is otherwise observationally identical. This reflects that the longer a parole board has discretion, the more valuable is additional information gleaned from observing behavior. A consequence is that an increase in sentence length can lead to even greater increases in expected time served. We also consider the effect of increased sentences on inmates’ incentives to undertake rehabilitative effort. To encourage effort, sentences cannot be too short, but when inmates discount the future sufficiently, long sentences may also be undesirable. We show how different parole board priors can support multiple equilibria in rehabilitation effort, and investigate the effects of discretion restrictions like parole eligibility.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cta
Date: 2009-01-23, Revised 2009-01-23
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://econ.ucalgary.ca/sites/econ.ucalgary.ca/fil ... ationRoberts2009.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Rehabilitated or Not?: To Release(/) is the Question (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:clg:wpaper:2009-06

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Department of Economics, University of Calgary
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by May Ives ().