A necessary condition for optimality in renegotiation design
Nicolas Boccard ()
No 1998052, CORE Discussion Papers from Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE)
Williamson (1979) claims that in a buyer-seller relationship with observable but unveriﬁable investments and state of nature, the hold up of future beneﬁts leads to underinvestment. Aghion, Dewatripont and Rey (1994) resolve it provided that the initial contract can specify a default option and allocate the bargaining power to either of the party in renegotiation. The necessity to rely on large ﬁnancial hostage or a “once-for-all” monetary penalty to implement the latter hypothesis is open to criticism but we show that the extreme allocation of the bargaining power is generically a necessary condition to implement the ﬁrst best investments. Edlin and Reichelstein’s (1996) ﬁrst best result with non-extreme allocation of the bargaining power is therefore a non-generic counter-example
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://alfresco.uclouvain.be/alfresco/download/att ... b/coredp_1998_52.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cor:louvco:1998052
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CORE Discussion Papers from Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE) Voie du Roman Pays 34, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Alain GILLIS ().