The importance of the embodied question revisited

Raouf Boucekkine (), Fernando del Rio and Omar Licandro ()

CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) from CEPREMAP

Abstract: In order to assess the importance of embodiment, we build up an endogenous growth model in which learning by doing is the engine of both embodied and disembodied technological progress. In sharp contrast to Phelps (1962), we show that a change in the composition of technical change affects the growth rate in the long run. We also provide an alternative explanation for the productivity slowdown: an increase in the learning efficiency of the capital goods sector, permanently lowers the growth rate of technological progress, by increasing the obsolescence costs of investment. The productivity slowdown occurs together with a rise in the rate of decline of investment goods prices. Finally, we show that an increase in the embodied fraction of technical change reduces the gap between the optimal and the desentralized growth rates.

JEL-codes: E22 E32 O40 C63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2000
View citations in EconPapers

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Importance of the Embodied Question Revisited (1999)
Working Paper: The importance of the embodied question revisited
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpm:cepmap:0001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) from CEPREMAP
Series data maintained by Michel Juillard ().