Abstract:
In this paper, we test whether labor-hoarding environments with basic and augmented laws of motion provide an adequate explanation for observed business cycle dynamics. The basic law of motion assumes that the information set used by economic agents to forecast future forcing variables includes only the history of forcing variables. Augmented laws of motion assume that the information set is superior and include both forcing and hidden exogenous variables. We show that the labor-hoarding environment with the basic law of motion fails to replicate observed business cycle facts, while the environment with augmented laws of motion successfully matches these facts.
More papers in Cahiers de recherche CREFE / CREFE Working Papers from CREFE, Université du Québec à Montréal Address: P.O. Box 8888, Downtown Station, Montreal (Canada) Quebec, H3C 3P8 Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Stéphane Pallage ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .