EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Using the EQ-5D as a performance measurement tool in the NHS

Nancy Devlin, David Parkin () and John Browne
Additional contact information
John Browne: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London

No 09/03, City University Economics Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, City University, London

Abstract: In a landmark move, the UK Department of Health (DH) is introducing the routine use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) as a means of measuring the performance of health care providers in improving patient health. From April 2009 all patients will be asked to complete both generic (EQ-5D) and condition specific PROMs before and after surgery for four elective procedures; the intention is to extend this to a wide range of other NHS services. The aim of this paper is to report analysis of the EQ-5D data generated from a pilot study commissioned by the DH, and to consider the implications of the results for their use as performance indicators and measures of patient benefit. The EQ-5D has the potential advantage in the context of PROMs of enabling comparisons of performance across services as well as between providers; and in facilitating assessments of the cost effectiveness of NHS services. We present two new methods we have developed for analysing and displaying EQ-5D profile data: a Paretian Classification of Health Change, and a Health Profile Grid. Using these methods, we show that EQ-5D data can readily be used to generate useful insights into differences between providers in improving overall changes in health; results are also suggestive of striking differences in changes in health between surgical procedures. We conclude by noting a number of issues that remain to be addressed in the use of PROMs data as a basis for performance indicators.

Keywords: EQ-5D; PROMs, health outcomes; performance indicators (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
Date: 2009-03
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.city.ac.uk/economics/dps/discussion_papers/0903.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cty:dpaper:0903

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in City University Economics Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, City University, London
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Michael Ben-Gad ().

 
Page updated 2009-11-23
Handle: RePEc:cty:dpaper:0903